Originally posted at khmerkrom.net: The latest drama played out on the international stage this week, no
more shocking then who are the actors involved: Vietnam versus the human
rights defender Khmers Kampuchea-Krom Federation (KKF).
Flying just under the international radar for over 20 years, KKF hits
the stage and received world wide support from the most powerful
countries including United States and the European Union when Vietnam
tries to get them kicked out of the United Nations Economic and Social
Council (ECOSOC).
It’s all started when in May 2012, ECOSOC’s Committee on
Non-governmental Organisations, in a consensus decision, approved KKF’s
application for special consultative status with the Council. Vietnam
protested strongly against the decision at the time.
This week a resolution to overturn the decision was tabled by Vietnam
along with El Salvador and fellow ASEAN member States Burma, Indonesia,
Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore
and Thailand.
In a supporting speech for a no vote, the United States say KKF is “a
peaceful advocacy organization based in the United States. It did
nothing other than help marginalized Khmers people in Viet Nam and raise
awareness of their situation” according to the UN document.
The United States representative recognize the KKF “had participated
in United Nations bodies for more than a decade and its principles were
in line with the Charter” and continue to urge the Council to oppose the
resolution citing “The role of civil society was to express independent
views. If the Council opposed accreditation, it risked denying the
whole reason the United Nations valued civil society in the first
place”.
Representative from Ireland speaking on behalf of the European Union
agrees that there’s nothing new about KKF, and that “The Union believed
that it was not appropriate to oppose accreditation for an organization
simply because it expressed views different from those of Governments
represented on the Council”.
Vietnam accused KKF of having a separatist agenda based merely on
statements made on KKF website which expresses the Khmer Krom people’s
frustration with the Vietnamese government for the over a century of
oppressions, ethnic cleansing through Vietnamization, massacres, land
grabbing and being treated as a second class citizen.
Sure Khmer Kroms want the right to self-determination as granted by
the UN International Covenant on Civl and Political Rights, which
Vietnam is a signatory.
The KKF’s policies are clear. Its aims and purposes are, through the
use of peaceful measures and international laws, to seek freedom,
justice, and the right to self-determination for the Indigenous
Khmer-Krom peoples living under the oppression of the Vietnamese
government in Southern Vietnam called Kampuchea-Krom in Khmer. There is
not even a thread of evidence to suggest that any KKF activities support
Vietnam’s claim.
By comparing some of the statements on KKF web site to same “pretext,
the Pol PotIeng Sary clique of the abhorrent, genocidal Khmer Rouge
regime … massacres of thousands of innocent Vietnamese civilians from
1977 to 1979” is not just insulting to the Cambodian people as a whole,
but also blatant disregard and disrespect for the dignity of the
estimated one hundred and fifty thousands Khmer Krom who were massacred
by the Khmer Rouge during the same period. Not to forget the many
thousands of Khmer Kroms who were sent by Vietnamese communist
government to the front line and get murdered in defense against the
Khmer Rouge.
KKF is the Khmer Krom’s only voice on the international stage.
Although the Council has voted to revoke KKF consultative status, it has
bolster its profile even higher through this drama with the support
from the US, EU and the International non-governmental organisations
including Human Rights Watch.
Vietnam have taken notice of the strength of Khmer Krom’s unity,
hence like a cowardice bully, attempt to trample on it. Only time will
tell the extends of ramification on Vietnam itself for its own action.
It has not dampened Khmer Krom's spirit; to the contrary in fact.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment